ArticleHealth services research2025
Medical Care for Patients With Mental Health and/or Substance-Use Disorders: A Qualitative Investigation of Emergency Department Patient Experiences and Recommendations.
Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' Experiences Caring for People Presenting to the Emergency Department With Mental Health Concerns.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Identifying challenges in concurrent mental health and substance use disorder care: qualitative findings from an e-Delphi study in British Columbia, Canada.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Medical Care for Patients With Mental Health and/or Substance-Use Disorders: A Qualitative Investigation of Emergency Department Patient Experiences and Recommendations.Health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectives(1) To investigate the healthcare experiences of individuals with mental health and/or substance use disorders (SUDs) who seek medical care in the emergency department (ED) for physical health concerns (e.g., abdominal pain), and (2) to explore recommendations for improving these patients' care experiences. Although this population suffers from a high disease burden and disproportionately seeks care in the ED, surprisingly little research has examined their experiences. STUDY SETTING AND
designQualitative study employing grounded theory and semi-structured interviews with patients with mental health and/or SUD(s) (identified via health records) seeking care for a physical health concern during an ED visit to an academic medical center in the Northeastern USA. Longer follow-up interviews were conducted via telephone. Interviews occurred between February 2018 and January 2019. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTICAL SAMPLE: We transcribed and coded digital recordings of interviews with 50 patients at two time periods. We used constant comparative analysis throughout interviewing, coding, and analysis. PRINCIPAL
findingsMost participants were White (80%), non-Hispanic (84%), and female (72%). Three key themes emerged, revealing a broad range of negative and positive patient care experiences that are influenced by provider, treatment, and healthcare system factors. Findings demonstrate that stigma and perceived biases due to mental health and/or SUDs extend to medical care experiences not directly related to these conditions (e.g., dismissive, rushed, unprofessional care, medical errors). Participants also identified positive care experiences (e.g., attentive, communicative, efficient, quality care), which informed recommendations for improving care.
conclusionsUnderstanding care experiences of vulnerable patient populations is critically important for informing interventions to improve their healthcare quality and safety. Findings underscore the need for additional education and training for providers, integrated behavioral healthcare, and widespread changes to the healthcare system. Localized interventions that target stigma and mismatches between patients' care expectations and ED capabilities are also needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.