Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136153›Full record

ReviewRevista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical2025

Fluconazole Resistance and Heteroresistance in Cryptococcus spp.: Mechanisms and Implications.

Izabela de Mesquita Bárcia Moreira, Naira Sulany Oliveira de Sousa, Juan Diego Ribeiro de Almeida, Robert Langlady Lira Rosas Filho, Katia Santana Cruz, Ani Beatriz Jackisch Matsuura, Márcia de Souza Carvalho Melhem, Érica Simplício de Souza, Hagen Frickmann, Marcus Vinícius Guimarães Lacerda and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Izabela de Mesquita Bárcia MoreiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede BIONORTE, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7032-8082
Naira Sulany Oliveira de SousaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede BIONORTE, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-1192
Juan Diego Ribeiro de AlmeidaInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9630-0029
Robert Langlady Lira Rosas FilhoInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9176-4271
Katia Santana CruzFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-7937
Ani Beatriz Jackisch MatsuuraInstituto Leônidas & Maria Deane, Fiocruz, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-1828
Márcia de Souza Carvalho MelhemFaculdade de Medicina, PPG Doenças Infecciosas e Parasitárias, UFMS, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1335-8808
Érica Simplício de SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede BIONORTE, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-4401
Hagen FrickmannBundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8967-9528
Marcus Vinícius Guimarães LacerdaFundação de Medicina Tropical Dr. Heitor Vieira Dourado, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3374-9985
João Vicente Braga de SouzaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede BIONORTE, Manaus, AM, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3163-7499

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reference methodology for evaluating antifungal susceptibility is based on determining the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), which is the lowest drug concentration capable of inhibiting fungal growth. However, such MIC data are insufficient to measure antifungal susceptibility if a strain is heteroresistant to the tested drug. In such cases, a minority subpopulation of fungal cells, originating from an initially susceptible lineage, can grow at antifungal drug concentrations above the MIC. In studies on fluconazole heteroresistance in Cryptococcus spp., chromosomal disomy has been shown to result in the overexpression of two genes located on chromosome 1 (Chr1) linked to antifungal resistance: ERG11 and AFR1. This review addresses the underlying mechanisms of antifungal resistance, the evolution of methods for determining antifungal susceptibility, and the clinical implications of Cryptococcus heteroresistance to fluconazole. The analysis of the findings indicated a correlation between heteroresistance and adverse clinical outcomes, although this observation still lacks definite confirmation in the literature. This highlights the need to implement more efficient therapeutic strategies and improve antifungal susceptibility and heteroresistance testing.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCryptococcusDrug Resistance, FungalFluconazoleHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAntifungal AgentsFluconazole

Identifiers

PMID40136153
PMCPMC11941007

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.