ReviewBiology2025
Extracellular Vesicles and Pregnancy-Related Hypertensive Disorders: A Descriptive Review on the Possible Implications "From Bench to Bedside".
Review in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Extracellular Vesicle Research: A Review of Systems Biology and Multiomics Perspectives.Proteomics · 2026Review
- Extracellular Vesicle-Associated Non-Coding RNAs in Preeclampsia: Mechanistic Insights, Biomarker Discovery, and Emerging Nanomedicine Concepts.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Hypertensive Pregnancy Disorders: From Mechanisms to Management.American journal of hypertension · 2026Review
- The Role of microRNA-210 in the Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of Preeclampsia-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Molecular Insights into Human Placentation: From Villous Morphogenesis to Pathological Pathways and Translational Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pregnancy involves extracellular vesicles (EVs) through mechanisms that are poorly understood to date. Furthermore, it is not surprising that EVs may also be involved in the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia (PE) and gestational hypertension, two clinical conditions with high morbidity and mortality, given their capacity to mediate intracellular communications and regulate inflammation and angiogenesis. We searched major online scientific search engines (PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, WES, Embase, etc.) using the terms "Preeclampsia", "Pregnancy", "Hypertension", "Pregnancy-related hypertension", "Extracellular vesicles", "Biomarkers", "Gestation" AND "Obstetrics". Finding potential early biomarkers of risk or illness progression would be essential for the optimum care of expectant mothers with the aforementioned conditions. Nevertheless, none of the various screening assays that have been discovered recently have shown high predictive values. The analysis of EVs in the peripheral blood starting from the first trimester of pregnancy may hold great promise for the possible correlation with gestational hypertension problems and represent a marker of the early stages of the disease. EVs use may be a novel therapeutic approach for the management of various illnesses, as well. In order to define EVs' function in the physiopathology of pregnancy-associated hypertension and PE, as well as their potential as early biomarkers and therapeutic tools, we have compiled the most recent data in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.