Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40136841›Full record

ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Single-Trial Electroencephalography Discrimination of Real, Regulated, Isometric Wrist Extension and Wrist Flexion.

Abdul-Khaaliq Mohamed, Vered Aharonson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdul-Khaaliq MohamedSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1526-1364
Vered AharonsonSchool of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2050, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4406-6525

Funding

National Research Foundation of South Africa 99207 and 117965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved interpretation of electroencephalography (EEG) associated with the neural control of essential hand movements, including wrist extension (WE) and wrist flexion (WF), could improve the performance of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). These BCIs could control a prosthetic or orthotic hand to enable motor-impaired individuals to regain the performance of activities of daily living. This study investigated the interpretation of neural signal patterns associated with kinematic differences between real, regulated, isometric WE and WF movements from recorded EEG data. We used 128-channel EEG data recorded from 14 participants performing repetitions of the wrist movements, where the force, speed, and range of motion were regulated. The data were filtered into four frequency bands: delta and theta, mu and beta, low gamma, and high gamma. Within each frequency band, independent component analysis was used to isolate signals originating from seven cortical regions of interest. Features were extracted from these signals using a time-frequency algorithm and classified using Mahalanobis distance clustering. We successfully classified bilateral and unilateral WE and WF movements, with respective accuracies of 90.68% and 69.80%. The results also demonstrated that all frequency bands and regions of interest contained motor-related discriminatory information. Bilateral discrimination relied more on the mu and beta bands, while unilateral discrimination favoured the gamma bands. These results suggest that EEG-based BCIs could benefit from the extraction of features from multiple frequencies and cortical regions.

Indexed as

brain–computer interfaceelectroencephalography (EEG)wrist extensionwrist flexion

Identifiers

PMID40136841
PMCPMC11939923

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.