ArticleBiosensors2025
Low-Cost, Open-Source, High-Precision Pressure Controller for Multi-Channel Microfluidics.
Article in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Micro Blood Flow-Resolved Rheometry.Micromachines · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microfluidics is a technology that manipulates liquids on the scales ranging from microliters to femtoliters. Such low volumes require precise control over pressures that drive their flow into the microfluidic chips. This article describes a custom-built pressure controller for driving microfluidic chips. The pressure controller features piezoelectrically controlled pressure regulation valves. As an open-source system, it offers high customizability and allows users to modify almost every aspect. The cost is roughly a third of what similar, alternative, commercially available piezoelectrically controlled pressure regulators could be purchased for. The measured output pressure values of the device vary less than 0.7% from the device's reported pressure values when the requested pressure is between -380 and 380 mbar. Importantly, the output pressure the device creates fluctuates only ±0.2 mbar when the pressure is cycled between 10 and 500 mbar. The pressure reading accuracy and stability validation suggest that the device is highly feasible for many advanced (low-pressure) microfluidic applications. Here, we compare the main features of our device to commercially and non-commercially available alternatives and further demonstrate the device's performance and accessibility in successful microfluidic hydrodynamic focusing (MHF)-based synthesis of large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.