ReviewMedicines (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Justice for Placebo: Placebo Effect in Clinical Trials and Everyday Practice.
Review in Medicines (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tirzepatide for sleep-disordered breathing in SURMOUNT-OSA: Time course and association with body weight.Sleep medicine · 2025Trial
- Article
- The evolving landscape of pharmacogenomics: Current achievements and future directions.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- Acupuncture for chronic insomnia with mild cognitive impairment: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- The Therapeutic Pipeline for Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Current Landscape and Future Directions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials vs. Real-World Data: How to Bridge the Gap in Pain Research.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Critical appraisal of: the effect of recreational therapy application on depression in hemodialysis patients: a randomized clinical trial.International urology and nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The placebo effect has been widely documented across various medical conditions, demonstrating its ability to influence both subjective and objective outcomes. Placebo responses can significantly improve symptoms in these different conditions, such as pain, Parkinson's disease, depression, anxiety, and addiction. Psychological mechanisms, particularly the power of patient expectations, appear to play a central role, with neurobiological evidence supporting the activation of dopamine, endogenous opioids, and endocannabinoids in response to placebo interventions. Studies have demonstrated that placebo injections and more complex procedures, including sham surgeries, can produce therapeutic effects comparable to real treatments, particularly in pain management and neurological disorders. Moreover, placebo responses could be amplified when patients are aware of receiving treatment, as shown by research on open-label placebos and open versus hidden medical treatments. The effectiveness of 0.9% sodium chloride solution as a placebo in clinical trials is debated, with some studies indicating its potential to induce clinical improvements, though it may not be an ideal control in inflammatory pain conditions. Advances in neuroimaging have revealed that placebo treatments trigger tangible biological processes in the brain and body and are supported by psychological and physiological mechanisms that interact, suggesting real biological processes are involved in the observed effects. Overall, the growing understanding of placebo mechanisms suggests that incorporating placebo-based strategies, with patient awareness and appropriate ethical considerations, may offer significant potential for improving patient outcomes, particularly in chronic pain, mental health, and neurological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.