ArticleJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Comparison of the Properties of Acellular Matrix from the Skins of Cod (
Article in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acellular tissue matrices of fish skin origin are highly promising materials for tissue engineering due to their low biological risks and few religious restrictions. The main component of acellular fish skin matrices (AFSMs) is collagen, but collagen properties significantly differ between marine and freshwater fish. Although the characteristics of acellular matrices may vary, relevant reports about them are few. In this study, we used cod and tilapia fish skin as raw materials to prepare acellular matrices with low DNA content (≤50 ng/mg) and low endotoxin. They were denoted as C-AFSM (cod) and T-AFSM (tilapia) and had endotoxin removal rates of 92.47% and 96.73%, respectively. Their physicochemical properties, cytotoxicity, and wound healing effects were evaluated and compared. Scanning electron microscopy images showed that C-AFSM and T-AFSM had collagenous meshwork and high porosity. They also did not induce skin irritations. Their proliferation rates on mouse fibroblasts at 36 h were 192.21% ± 33.25% and 162.89% ± 36.47%, respectively. The wound healing effect of C-AFSM was faster than that of T-AFSM group (7 and 14 days: 45.3% ± 5.99% and 93.77% ± 1.58% for C-AFSM and 39.7% ± 2.84% and 93.35% ± 1.1% for T-AFSM, respectively). Therefore, the two acellular fish skin matrices can be used as tissue-engineering materials for wound repair, with C-AFSM being more effective than T-AFSM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.