Observational studyBJS open2025
Regional variation in non-traumatic major lower limb amputation in England: observational study of linked primary and secondary care data.
Observational study in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Impact of Endovascular Revascularization in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Versus Claudication: A Contemporary Real-World Analysis.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
- Peri-operative pain management in major lower extremity amputation in vascular Surgery: a UK anaesthetic and vascular surgery Delphi consensus study.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Lower limb amputation in incident dialysis patients in England: incidence, outcomes and inter-centre variation from a national registry study.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Diabetes care for people experiencing homelessness in the UK: insights from a national survey of frontline professionals and the development of an integrated care model.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeripheral artery disease and diabetes are the main primary risk factors for non-traumatic major lower limb amputation. Regional variation in incidence of major lower limb amputation has yet to be fully described in terms of these risk factors and explained. The aim of this study was to estimate yearly incidence of major lower limb amputation over a 10-year interval (2010-2019) across England, by related condition and by region and, additionally, to investigate reasons for regional variation.
methodsThis observational study utilized primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum), secondary care (Hospital Episode Statistics), death and demographic data in England. Adults registered with a practice using Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and with Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were included. Patients with a record of major lower limb amputation during the interval 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2019 were identified and yearly incidence rates of major lower limb amputation were calculated. Co-morbidities analysed were cardiovascular disease (including coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease and cerebrovascular disease), diabetes (of any type) and cancer. Demographic and socioeconomic covariates analysed were age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation level, region and urban/rural categorization.
resultsThe study included 18 397 483 individuals, 8584 of which had a record of major lower limb amputation. The age-standardized yearly incidence rate of major lower limb amputation in England decreased by 30% from 11.2 per 100 000 person-years in 2010 to 7.8 in 2019. The incidence rate in those with diabetes fell by 30% over the 10-year interval, rose by 20% for those with both diabetes and cardiovascular disease, and changed little in those with cardiovascular disease. In 2019, the age-standardized incidence rate was highest in the North East (14.8 per 100 000 person-years) and lowest in the East of England (4.5 per 100 000 person-years). Between 2010 and 1019, incidence rates decreased across all regions, the largest decrease of 56% in the East Midlands and the smallest of 8% in the North East. Statistically significant regional variation remained after full adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic data and related conditions.
conclusionWhilst the incidence of major lower limb amputation is decreasing overall, significant regional variation in major lower limb amputation exists and is unexplained by demographic, socioeconomic and health data. Regional differences in service provision and accessibility should be investigated to provide further explanation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.