ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2025
Discussion of a Simple Method to Generate Descriptive Images Using Predictive ResNet Model Weights and Feature Maps for Recurrent Cervix Cancer.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredictive models like Residual Neural Networks (ResNets) can use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data to identify cervix tumors likely to recur after radiotherapy (RT) with high accuracy. However, there persists a lack of insight into model selections (explainability). In this study, we explored whether model features could be used to generate simulated images as a method of model explainability.
methodsT2W MRI data were collected for twenty-seven women with cervix cancer who received RT from the TCGA-CESC database. Simulated images were generated as follows: [A] a ResNet model was trained to identify recurrent cervix cancer; [B] a model was evaluated on T2W MRI data for subjects to obtain corresponding feature maps; [C] most important feature maps were determined for each image; [D] feature maps were combined across all images to generate a simulated image; [E] the final image was reviewed by a radiation oncologist and an initial algorithm to identify the likelihood of recurrence.
resultsPredictive feature maps from the ResNet model (93% accuracy) were used to generate simulated images. Simulated images passed through the model were identified as recurrent and non-recurrent cervix tumors after radiotherapy. A radiation oncologist identified the simulated images as cervix tumors with characteristics of aggressive Cervical Cancer. These images also contained multiple MRI features not considered clinically relevant.
conclusionThis simple method was able to generate simulated MRI data that mimicked recurrent and non-recurrent cervix cancer tumor images. These generated images could be useful for evaluating the explainability of predictive models and to assist radiologists with the identification of features likely to predict disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.