ArticleNeuroSci2025
Open Midline Decompression with Ligament Reconstruction for Multiple-Level Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients.
Article in NeuroSci, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(1) Background: Multiple lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative disease that is increasingly prevalent with global aging. Multilevel fusion surgery is burdensome to perform in elderly patients, especially with osteoporosis and underlying disease. This study introduces open midline decompression (OMD) with ligament reconstruction as an alternative stabilization technique for elderly patients with multilevel LSS. (2) Methods: A retrospective review included 42 elderly patients aged 70 or older diagnosed with LSS at three or more levels and who underwent OMD with ligament reconstruction. Pre- and postoperative clinical and radiologic data were analyzed. (3) Results: Thirty-three patients underwent three-level surgeries, and twelve patients underwent four-level surgeries. The mean operative time was 240 ± 42.2 min (74.6 ± 14.9 min per level) with a mean blood loss of 282.9 ± 167.1 cc. Clinical outcome (VAS) and quality of life parameters (SF-12) showed significant improvement after surgery. Postoperative MRI showed sufficient decompression. Dynamic X-rays showed improvement in instability after surgery, but it was statistically insignificant. (4) Conclusions: OMD with ligament reconstruction provides effective neural decompression while preserving the posterior arch and offers soft stabilization with artificial ligaments. It is a safe and viable surgical option for elderly patients with multilevel LSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.