ArticlePloS one2025
Bromocriptine improves glucose tolerance in obese mice via central dopamine D2 receptor-independent mechanism.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Orexin and Lifestyle Habits: A Meaningful Connection Among Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Sleep Pattern in Health and Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Structure-Based Discovery of Orthosteric Non-Peptide GLP-1R Agonists via Integrated Virtual Screening and Molecular Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bromocriptine, generally regarded as a dopamine D2 receptor agonist, has been used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes in the USA; however, its mechanisms of action including the receptors that mediate its anti-diabetic effects remain unclear. Therefore, we herein conducted pharmacological and genetic knockout experiments to investigate how bromocriptine improves glucose metabolism under type 2 diabetic conditions. Bromocriptine transiently increased blood glucose levels in both wild-type and dopamine D2 receptor-deficient mice. This glucose-elevating effect was blocked by the α2-adrenergic receptor antagonist yohimbine. On the other hand, when bromocriptine was administered daily for two weeks, glucose tolerance improved in wild-type mice fed a high-fat diet. Similar anti-diabetic effects of bromocriptine were observed in dopamine D2 receptor-deficient, dopamine D1 receptor-deficient, and orexin-deficient mice under the diet-induced obese condition as well as in genetically obese db/db mice. Bromocriptine-induced improvements in glucose tolerance were not affected by a pretreatment with the autonomic ganglion blocker hexamethonium, which suggested the involvement of the peripheral effects of bromocriptine. Given the biphasic properties of bromocriptine, we examined the drug effect on hepatic endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress that dually regulates glucose metabolism. In the livers of diet-induced obese mice, the levels of ER stress markers, including C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), were reduced by the daily administration of bromocriptine. In human hepatoma HepG2 cells, increases in CHOP expression by thapsigargin, a potent inducer of ER stress, were prevented by a pretreatment with low concentrations of bromocriptine, whereas high concentrations induced CHOP expression. These results suggest that low concentrations of bromocriptine caused beneficial ER stress preconditioning, which protected against subsequent severe ER stress in the liver. Therefore, bromocriptine may prevent obesity-induced glucose intolerance via peripheral mechanisms including promotion of hepatic ER homeostasis, but not central dopamine D2 receptor-mediated mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.