ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2026
Exploring Psychotropic Medication Use in Hospitalized Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in China: The Role of Intellectual Disability.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) frequently present with mental health comorbidities and behavioral crises, necessitating inpatient care. However, evidence-based guidelines for psychotropic medication use in specialized inpatient settings remain limited, particularly in non-Western contexts. This study examined the clinical characteristics and prescribing patterns among 269 hospitalized ASD patients (2012-2023), with a focus on how intellectual disability (ID) influences medication decisions. A retrospective analysis was conducted using electronic medical records to assess mental disorders, behavioral challenges, and psychotropic medication use at discharge. Logistic regression analyses was performed to examine factors associated with medication prescribing patterns, including the impact of ID status. Psychotropic medication use was highly prevalent (96.7%), with antipsychotics (89.96%) being the most frequently prescribed class, followed by anxiolytics (35.32%) and antidepressants (33.09%). ID was significantly associated with distinct prescribing patterns: patients with ID had 63% lower odds of antidepressant use (aOR = 0.37, p = 0.001) and 80% lower odds of ADHD medication use (aOR = 0.20, p = 0.009), while being more likely to receive antipsychotics (aOR = 2.74, p = 0.049) and experience polypharmacy (aOR = 1.89, p = 0.028). Additionally, disruptive behaviors and age were key predictors of antipsychotic use, whereas suicidal thoughts/attempts or SIBs independently predicted antidepressant prescribing. These findings suggest that ID status plays a critical role in shaping psychotropic prescribing practices beyond symptom severity alone, potentially reflecting diagnostic overshadowing and safety concerns. Future research should focus on developing tailored clinical assessment tools and treatment protocols for ASD populations with and without ID, while enhancing individualized medication monitoring to optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40140209What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.