Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40140906›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine and health2025

The association between 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for hypertension and neonatal outcomes in Kenya: a retrospective study.

Mami Hitachi, Kazuchiyo Miyamichi, Sumihisa Honda, Violet Wanjihia, Samson Muuo Nzou, Satoshi Kaneko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mami HitachiDepartment of Ecoepidemiology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan. mhitachi@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
Kazuchiyo MiyamichiKenya Research Station, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Sumihisa HondaDepartment of Nursing, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan.
Violet WanjihiaCentre for Public Health Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Samson Muuo NzouCentre for Microbiology Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Satoshi KanekoDepartment of Ecoepidemiology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H00564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension in pregnancy serves to screen for adverse perinatal outcomes. In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommended a new blood pressure category with lower hypertension thresholds, excluding pregnancy. This study aimed to explore the association between the 2017 redefined blood pressure categories in pregnancy and neonatal outcomes such as preterm birth and low birth weight.

methodsThis retrospective study used electronic records of the Maternal and Child Health Handbook registered by the Women and Infant Registration System. All women who had at least one antenatal care visit and delivery between January 2017 and April 2020 and between May and December 2022 were included in the study. A birth of less than 37 weeks was defined as preterm delivery. LBW was identified based on a newborn's birthweight of less than 2500 g. The maximum blood pressure across all antenatal care visits was classified based on the newly recommended criteria. A generalized linear model with binomial distribution and logit link function was used to evaluate the association between new blood pressure categories and neonatal outcomes at different levels of health facilities.

resultsWe analyzed data from 825 women. Of these, the prevalence was 13.7% for elevated blood pressure, 15.2% for stage 1 hypertension, 4.5% for non-severe stage 2 hypertension and 1.2% for severe stage 2 hypertension. For lower-level facilities, no significant associations were identified between the redefined blood pressure category and preterm birth or low birthweight. At higher-level facilities, preterm birth was only significantly associated with severe stage 2 hypertension (adjusted odds ratio:10.94; 95% confidence interval:1.08-110.93; P = 0.04) and low birthweight showed no association with the redefined category.

conclusionThis study revealed no association between redefined lower blood pressure threshold and preterm birth and low birthweight in under-resourced settings. However, previous studies in well-resourced countries with larger sample sizes also reported a significant association. Therefore, further investigations are required.

Indexed as

Adverse neonatal outcomeHypertensionLow birth weightLow-resource settingPregnancyPreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID40140906
PMCPMC11948941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.