ArticleHead & face medicine2025
Deep learning based quantitative cervical vertebral maturation analysis.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiographic choice for skeletal maturation assessment: a systematic review of Cervical Vertebrae Method and Middle Phalanx Method.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for predicting the pubertal growth spurt using cephalometric and hand-wrist radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Automated measurement of Little's Irregularity Index on intraoral photographs using a convolutional neural network.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of a Machine Learning Model for Cervical Vertebra-Based Skeletal Maturity Assessment in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients Using Cephalometric Radiographs.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Single-model deep learning approach for simultaneous cervical vertebral maturation staging and skeletal jaw relationship on lateral cephalograms using YOLOv8 and CNN.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for Cervical Spine Radiography: Automated Measurement of Intervertebral and Neural Foraminal Distances.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to enhance clinical diagnostics for quantitative cervical vertebral maturation (QCVM) staging with precise landmark localization. Existing methods are often subjective and time-consuming, while deep learning alternatives withstand the complex anatomical variations. Therefore, we designed an advanced two-stage convolutional neural network customized for improved accuracy in cervical vertebrae analysis.
methodsThis study analyzed 2100 cephalometric images. The data distribution to an 8:1:1 for training, validation, and testing. The CVnet system was designed as a two-step method with a comprehensive evaluation of various regions of interest (ROI) sizes to locate 19 cervical vertebral landmarks and classify precision maturation stages. The accuracy of landmark localization was assessed by success detection rate and student t-test. The QCVM diagnostic accuracy test was conducted to evaluate the assistant performances of our system for six junior orthodontists.
resultsUpon precise calibration with optimal ROI size, the landmark localization registered an average error of 0.66 ± 0.46 mm and a success detection rate of 98.10% within 2 mm. Additionally, the identification accuracy of QCVM stages was 69.52%, resulting in an enhancement of 10.95% in the staging accuracy of junior orthodontists in the diagnostic test.
conclusionsThis study presented a two-stage neural network that successfully automated the identification of cervical vertebral landmarks and the staging of QCVM. By streamlining the workflow and enhancing the accuracy of skeletal maturation estimation, this method offered valuable clinical support, particularly for practitioners with limited experience or access to advanced diagnostic resources, facilitating more consistent and reliable treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.