ArticleCancer science2025
Real-World Data Analysis of Genomic Alterations Detected by a Dual DNA-RNA Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Test.
Article in Cancer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Germline pathogenic variants in Japanese adolescents and young adults with advanced solid tumors: a nationwide tumor-normal paired sequencing study.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Observational
- Workforce and institutional factors associated with comprehensive genomic profiling utilization in gynecologic oncology: a nationwide questionnaire survey in Japan.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
- Article
- Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Glioblastoma, IDH-Wildtype With FGFR Gene Family Alterations.Cancer science · 2026Article
- Proton Irradiation Induces Differential Cellular Responses and Proteomic Signatures in Chondrosarcoma and Chondrocytes.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- CUX1::MET fusion defines an indolent subtype of diffuse low-grade glioma, MAPK pathway-altered.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2026Article
- Targeting Genome Maintenance Defects of Cancers Using Chain-Terminating Nucleoside Analogs.Cancer science · 2026Review
- Germline pathogenic variants detected by GenMineTOP: insight from a nationwide tumor/normal paired comprehensive genomic profiling test, in Japan.Journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- FGFR2 Might Be a Promising Therapeutic Target for Some Solid Tumors: Analysis of 1312 Cancers withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Nationwide Real-World Usage of Blood-Based (Liquid) Biomarker Testing in Japan.Cancer science · 2025Article
- Real-World Data of Comprehensive Cancer Genomic Profiling Tests Performed in the Routine Clinical Setting in Sarcoma.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Definitive Diagnosis of Angiomatoid Fibrous Histiocytoma Using Dual DNA/RNA Genomic Profiling.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GenMineTOP, the first dual DNA-RNA comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test in Japan, was approved for reimbursement in 2023. To evaluate its clinical utility, we analyzed 1356 cases from the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) database. Oncogenic genomic alterations were identified in 91.5% of cases. Somatic mutations were the most prevalent, followed by amplifications and fusion/exon skipping events. The DNA panel, covering 737 genes, detected not only alterations relevant to therapeutic decisions but also those providing insights into tumor biology. Among the latter, frequently observed examples included mutations in KMT2C (n = 28) and ARID1B (n = 24), and amplifications in GLI1 (n = 14) and YAP1 (n = 10), which are not included in other CGP tests approved in Japan. The RNA panel identified 105 fusion events, including 11 NTRK fusions (0.8%), of which five were NTRK3 fusions: two with the well-known ETV6-NTRK3 fusion and three with non-ETV6 partners. Forty-nine of these fusions were diagnostically significant, highlighting the utility of the RNA panel. Amplification-RNA expression analyses revealed strong correlations for MDM2, CDK4, EGFR, and ERBB2. In contrast, weaker correlations observed for MYC and FGFR1 highlighted the need for careful interpretation of amplification in these genes. Cancer type significantly influenced RNA expression, with KIT and TERT mutations linked to increased expression and significant overexpression observed in ALK, FGFR3, NTRK1, NTRK3, and RET fusions. In summary, this study demonstrated the real-world clinical utility of the dual DNA-RNA CGP test and provided a valuable resource for interpreting RNA expressions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.