ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025
In Silico Investigation of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists: Insights into Binding Mechanisms and Structural Dynamics.
Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In Silico Decoding of Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Binding: Implications for Drug Design.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) is a steroid hormone receptor that plays a key role in regulating sodium and water homeostasis and blood pressure. MR antagonists are a guideline recommended for therapy for the treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular disease but can cause hyperkalaemia. Modelling was performed for binding of the endogenous ligands aldosterone and cortisol and MR antagonist spironolactone to the ligand binding domain (LBD) of the MR. A molecular docking screen of compounds that were structurally similar to known antagonists was performed, leading to the identification of two novel compounds, C79 and E67. Molecular dynamics (MD) assessed the dynamic interactions with C79, E76, endogenous ligands, and spironolactone with the MR ligand binding domain (LBD). Analysis of the protein backbone showed modest changes in the overall structure of the MR LBD in response to binding of antagonists, with movement in helix 12 consistent with previous observations. All ligands tested maintained stable binding within the MR LBD throughout the simulations. Hydrogen bond formation played a more prominent role in the binding of endogenous ligands compared to antagonists. MM-PBSA binding free energy calculations showed that all ligands had similar binding affinities, with binding facilitated by key residues within the binding site. The novel antagonists demonstrated similar binding properties to spironolactone, warranting further evaluation. This study provides insights into the molecular mechanisms of MR activation and inhibition, which can aid in the development of novel therapeutic strategies for cardiovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.