ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025
Bone Health for Gynaecologists.
Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- KunTai capsules combined with Femoston in premature ovarian insufficiency: a randomized controlled trial of the effects on bone mineral density.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Trial
- Bone mineral density in adolescents and young women with hypogonadism: a DXA-based comparative analysis.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2026Article
- Hormonal Shifts and Structural Strain: A Literature Review of Menopause and Perimenopause in Relation to Overuse Injuries and Stress Fractures.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular mechanisms and translational prospects in osteoporosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Age-related inflammatory biomarkers in early-onset osteoporosis in females with Gaucher disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis, the most common bone disorder, profoundly impacts women's health, especially during postmenopausal phases. Characterised by diminished bone mineral density (BMD), it increases the risk of fractures, affecting mobility, quality of life, and potentially mortality. The present review analyses the intricate interactions among physiological alterations, diseases, and medications that lead to bone mineral density reduction in women. It underscores the importance of gynaecologists in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of osteoporosis via early risk assessment, suitable hormone treatment, and lifestyle modifications. Essential considerations encompass the categorisation of osteoporosis into primary (age-related) and secondary (attributable to diseases or pharmacological treatments) types, with particular emphasis on predisposing conditions such as premature menopause, hormone deficits, and cancer therapies. The significance of diagnostic instruments such as DXA and novel methodologies like trabecular bone score and quantitative ultrasonography is emphasised for precise evaluation and surveillance. The review also addresses nutritional methods, physical exercise, and pharmaceutical interventions, including hormone replacement therapy (HRT), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and other anti-resorptive drugs, to preserve bone health. This review highlights the important role of gynaecologists in maintaining women's bone health, promoting a proactive strategy to avert osteoporosis-related complications and enhance long-term results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.