ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Bone Regeneration: A Review of Current Treatment Strategies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Here today, gone tomorrow: the transformative role of biodegradable materials in modern trauma care.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Bioprinting of miRNA-Induced Spheroids for Vascularized, Heterocellular Bone Regeneration.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2026Article
- Influence of Ti-6Al-4V Scaffold Architecture on Early Cellular Responses Relevant to Bone Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative Analysis of Bone Remodeling Dynamics and Bone Vitality Following Standard Bone Augmentation Procedures: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- A Review of Rejuvenation Strategies Targeting Mesenchymal Stem Cell Senescence and Their Impact on Bone Health and Regeneration.Current osteoporosis reports · 2026Review
- Germanium-doped calcium phosphate ceramics in combination with mesenchymal stem cells derived from the neural crest, obtained from rabbit vibrissae: an experimental model of rabbit jaw regeneration.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Apt19s-functionalized 3D-printed PCL/58S bioactive glass scaffoldsRSC advances · 2026Article
- Biochemical and Physicomechanical Cues of Biomaterials Guide Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Epigenetic Connections in Malocclusion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Dual-Functional Gel-Based Delivery of Chitosan-Coated Gold Nanoparticles for Accelerated Bone Healing in Defect Models.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Sustained release PLGA microspheres loaded with a bone-affinity Bmp2 enhance fracture healing and mitigate heterotopic ossification.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- DPHD fromACS omega · 2026Article
- Histomorphometric Evaluation of Socket Preservation Healing Using Xenogeneic Bone Substitute Combined with Statin: A Prospective Split-Mouth Clinical Pilot Study.Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026Article
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Biological Interactions in Rat Tibial Osteogenesis: Micro-CT, Histomorphometric, and Histological Analyses of Bioglass, Fibrin Biopolymer, and Photobiomodulation.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effects of soluble guanylate cyclase activator vericiguat on fracture healing in rats.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2026Article
- Structure-Property Relationships in PHB-Based Copolymers and PHB/PLA Biocomposites Modified with Hydroxyapatite and Chitosan.Polymers · 2026Article
- Management of Advanced Peri-Implantitis with Staged Explantation and Delayed Re-Implantation in the Esthetic Zone.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone regeneration has emerged as a critical research and clinical advancement field, fueled by the growing demand for effective treatments in orthopedics and oncology. Over the past two decades, significant progress in biomaterials and surgical techniques has led to the development of novel solutions for treating bone defects, surpassing the use of traditional autologous grafts. This review aims to assess the latest approaches in bone regeneration, including autologous, allogenic, and xenogenic grafts, naturally derived biomaterials, and innovative synthetic substitutes such as bioceramics, bioactive glasses, metals, polymers, composite materials, and other specialized applications. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, focusing on studies published between 2019 and 2024, including meta-analyses, reviews, and systematic reviews. The review evaluated a range of bone regeneration strategies, examining the clinical outcomes, materials used, surgical techniques, and the effectiveness of various approaches in treating bone defects. The search identified numerous studies, with the inclusion criteria focused on those exploring innovative bone regeneration strategies. These studies provided valuable insights into the clinical and biological outcomes of different biomaterials and graft types. Results indicated that while advancements in synthetic and naturally derived biomaterials show promising potential, challenges remain in optimizing therapeutic strategies across diverse patient populations and clinical settings. The findings emphasize the need for an integrated approach that combines scientific research, clinical practice, and technological innovation to improve bone regeneration therapies. Further research is required to establish standardized protocols and determine the optimal application of various materials and techniques to enhance patient outcomes and the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.