Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40142829›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025

The Meniscus: Basic Science and Therapeutic Approaches.

Nikodem Kuczyński, Julia Boś, Kinga Białoskórska, Zuzanna Aleksandrowicz, Bartosz Turoń, Maria Zabrzyńska, Klaudia Bonowicz, Maciej Gagat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Collagen-Based Scaffolds for Meniscal Repair and Regeneration.Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nikodem KuczyńskiDepartment of Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Mazovian Academy in Płock, 09-402 Płock, Poland.
Julia BośDepartment of Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Mazovian Academy in Płock, 09-402 Płock, Poland.
Kinga BiałoskórskaDepartment of Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Mazovian Academy in Płock, 09-402 Płock, Poland.
Zuzanna AleksandrowiczDepartment of Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Mazovian Academy in Płock, 09-402 Płock, Poland.
Bartosz TurońDepartment of Trauma and Orthopedics, Regional Specialist Hospital in Grudziądz, 86-300 Grudziądz, Poland.
Maria ZabrzyńskaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Klaudia BonowiczDepartment of Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Mazovian Academy in Płock, 09-402 Płock, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2098-2799
Maciej GagatDepartment of Morphological and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, Mazovian Academy in Płock, 09-402 Płock, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5445-8821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper function and longevity of the knee joint are ensured by the knee menisci. Their susceptibility to damage and injury is one of the main risk factors for rapid cartilage loss and the development of osteoarthritis. The vascularization pattern and nutritional status of a torn meniscus determine its potential for healing and the success of meniscus surgery. Blood supply is a crucial factor in assessing healing potential. Knee cartilage volume loss and its modification often result from meniscal damage or excision, leading to osteoarthritis. Modern methods for preserving meniscal tissue are currently the treatment of choice. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for assessing meniscus lesions. It provides a comprehensive evaluation of tear stability and progression risk. Additionally, it offers high sensitivity and specificity. Arthrography combined with computed tomography (CT) can be used for patients who are unable to undergo MRI. Other methods, such as X-ray and ultrasound, are not useful for the typical diagnosis of meniscal lesions. Minimally invasive surgery has become the gold standard for both treatment and diagnosis. Modern techniques, such as all-inside compression sutures and other suturing techniques, are also considered. In contrast, in the past, open total meniscectomy was routinely performed as the gold standard, based on the mistaken belief that the menisci were functionless. Currently, new treatment methods for meniscal lesions are being explored, including mesenchymal stem cells, synthetic implants, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The crucial role of the menisci in knee biomechanics drives the development of modern solutions focused on preserving meniscal tissue.

Indexed as

knee biomechanicsmeniscusosteoarthritisregenerative therapies

Identifiers

PMID40142829
PMCPMC11942698

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.