ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Review of the Diagnosis and Management of Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD-PH).
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating the Complexity of PH-ILD: From Molecular Mechanisms to Integrated Clinical Evaluation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Beyond IPF: Pulmonary Function Test Predictors of Echocardiographic Pulmonary Hypertension Across the Spectrum of ILD.Pulmonary circulation · 2026Article
- A Lung Ultrasound-Integrated Clinical Model for Predicting Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in Patients with Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD-PH) frequently complicates the course of patients with fibrotic ILD. In this narrative review, the authors assess current diagnostic tools and management considerations in ILD-PH patients. ILD-PH is associated with increased morbidity and mortality and may be suggested by the presence of symptoms out of proportion to the extent of the ILD. There are other clues to the presence of PH in the context of ILD including the need for supplemental oxygen, a reduced DLCO especially if accompanied by a disproportionately higher forced vital capacity, imaging demonstrating an enlarged pulmonary artery or a dilated right ventricle, or objective evidence of a reduced exercise capacity. While echocardiography is one screening tool, right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of PH. When appropriate, treatment with inhaled treprostinil, or possibly other pulmonary vasodilators, may be indicated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.