ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Induced Mesenchymal Stem Cells: An Emerging Source for Regenerative Medicine Applications.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioengineered Cellular and Acellular Therapies for Ischemic Heart Disease in Clinically Relevant Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Stem Cell Based Regenerative Applications for the Management of Diabetes Induced Systemic Complications.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- UV-cure hydrogels for cardiac regeneration: a comprehensive review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regenerative medicine is gaining interest in the medical field due to the limitations of conventional treatments, which often fail to address the underlying cause of disease. In recent years, stem cell-based therapies have evolved as a promising alternative approach to treat those diseases that cannot be cured using conventional medicine. Adult stem cells, particularly the mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), have attracted a lot of attention due to their ability to regenerate and repair human tissues and organs. MSCs isolated from adult tissues are well characterized and are currently the most common type of cells for use in regenerative medicine. However, their low number in adult donor tissues, donor-age and cell-source related heterogeneity, limited proliferative and differentiation potential, and early senescence in in vitro cultures, negatively affect MSC regenerative potential. These factors restrict MSC use for research as well as for clinical applications. To overcome these problems, MSCs with superior regenerative potential are required. Induced MSCs (iMSCs) are obtained from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These cells are patient-specific, readily available, and have relatively superior regenerative potential and, therefore, can overcome the problems associated with the use of primary MSCs. In this review, the authors aim to discuss the characteristics, regenerative potential, and limitations of MSCs for regenerative medicine applications. The main methods to generate iMSCs from iPSCs have been discussed in detail. In addition, the proposed criteria for their molecular characterization, applications of iMSCs for disease modeling and drug discovery, as well as potential use in regenerative medicine have been explored in detail.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.