ReviewPharmaceutics2025
Nanomanaging Chronic Wounds with Targeted Exosome Therapeutics.
Review in Pharmaceutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogel-extracellular vesicle engineering delivery system: a promising therapeutic strategy for wound healing.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- A Purified Platelet-Derived Exosome Product for Chronic Wound Healing: A Novel Therapeutic Strategy and Next-Generation Delivery Platform.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Animal Models in Wound Healing Research and the Utility for Humanized Mice Models.Advances in wound care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chronic wounds pose a significant healthcare challenge, impacting millions of patients worldwide and burdening healthcare systems substantially. These wounds often occur as comorbidities and are prone to infections. Such infections hinder the healing process, complicating clinical management and proving recalcitrant to therapy. The environment within the wound itself poses challenges such as lack of oxygen, restricted blood flow, oxidative stress, ongoing inflammation, and bacterial presence. Traditional systemic treatment for such chronic peripheral wounds may not be effective due to inadequate blood supply, resulting in unintended side effects. Furthermore, topical applications are often impervious to persistent biofilm infections. A growing clinical concern is the lack of effective therapeutic modalities for treating chronic wounds. Additionally, the chemically harsh wound microenvironment can reduce the effectiveness of treatments, highlighting the need for drug delivery systems that can deliver therapies precisely where needed with optimal dosages. Compared to cell-based therapies, exosome-based therapies offer distinct advantages as a cell-free approach for chronic wound treatment. Exosomes are of endosomal origin and enable cell-to-cell communications, and they possess benefits, including biocompatibility and decreased immunogenicity, making them ideal vehicles for efficient targeting and minimizing off-target damage. However, exosomes are rapidly cleared from the body, making it difficult to maintain optimal therapeutic concentrations at wound sites. The hydrogel-based approach and development of biocompatible scaffolds for exosome-based therapies can be beneficial for sustained release and prolong the presence of these therapeutic exosomes at chronic wound sites. Engineered exosomes have been shown to possess stability and effectiveness in promoting wound healing compared to their unmodified counterparts. Significant progress has been made in this field, but further research is essential to unlock their clinical potential. This review seeks to explore the benefits and opportunities of exosome-based therapies in chronic wounds, ensuring sustained efficacy and precise delivery despite the obstacles posed by the wound environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.