ReviewViruses2025
Structural Capsidomics of Single-Stranded DNA Viruses.
Review in Viruses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of canine parvovirus-2-based recombinant pseudoviruses expression system: a potential vaccine platform.Veterinary research · 2026Article
- The amazing AAV capsids: Into the structure-verse.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Review
- Twenty years of human bocavirus research: from an unculturable virus of unclear pathogenicity to a culturable human pathogen and gene therapy vector candidate.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses are a diverse group of pathogens with broad host range, including bacteria, archaea, protists, fungi, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates. Their small compact genomes have evolved to encode multiple proteins. This review focuses on the structure and functional diversity of the icosahedral capsids across the ssDNA viruses. To date, X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy structural studies have provided detailed capsid architectures for 8 of the 35 ssDNA virus families, illustrating variations in assembly mechanisms, symmetry, and structural adaptations of the capsid. However, common features include the conserved jelly-roll motif of the capsid protein and strategies for genome packaging, also showing evolutionary convergence. The ever-increasing availability of genomic sequences of ssDNA viruses and predictive protein modeling programs, such as using AlphaFold, allows for the extension of structural insights to the less-characterized families. Therefore, this review is a comparative analysis of the icosahedral ssDNA virus families and how the capsid proteins are arranged with different tessellations to form icosahedral spheres. It summarizes the current knowledge, emphasizing gaps in the structural characterization of the ssDNA capsidome, and it underscores the importance of continued exploration to understand the molecular underpinnings of capsid function and evolution. These insights have implications for virology, molecular biology, and therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.