Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144087›Full record

ArticleMedical science educator2025

The Organization of Vital Signs for Pattern Recognition.

Casey Zhang, Louis Collins, Ernest K Manders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science educator, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Casey ZhangUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Louis CollinsRutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark NJ, USA.
Ernest K MandersDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8825-9161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: Vital signs are simple, inexpensive, and the most frequently documented information gathered on patients in the hospital. However, in today's medical training system, emphasis on the interpretation of vital signs has declined. For new clinicians entering the wards, the physiological basis of vital signs and their clinical utility is of utmost importance to providing thorough care. In this article, we present four clinical scenarios highlighting aberrations in vital signs that are commonly encountered on the wards. We describe the physiological basis and interpretation of these vital signs, which we hope will serve as a clinical framework for medical trainees. Clinical Scenario: You are the intern working a night shift. As you are catching up on notes, you receive a page from the nurse for one of your patients. The nurse informs you that this previously stable patient has a blood pressure of 180/95 and a heart rate of 55 beats per minute. The nurse is concerned about these vital signs and asks you to evaluate the patient.This clinical scenario raises several important questions including:Are these vital signs concerning?What could cause this change in vital signs?Do these vital signs warrant immediate intervention or is it safe to observe the patient?Is one aberrant vital sign enough to warrant intervention?The goal of this article is to answer these and other questions regarding vital signs and the clinical scenarios that they indicate.

Indexed as

Clinical guideInterpretation of vital signsMedical educationVital sign interpretationVital signs

Identifiers

PMID40144087
PMCPMC11933627

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.