Abemaciclib in combination with therapies for patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase 1b study.

Background: The oral, selective, and potent small molecule cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) abemaciclib has demonstrated efficacy in advanced breast cancer and high-risk early breast cancer. This Phase 1b study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapies (Parts A-D), exemestane + everolimus (Part E), or fulvestrant + LY3023414 (a PI3K/mTOR inhibitor; Part G) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), or trastuzumab (Part F), or trastuzumab + pertuzumab (Part H) in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) MBC. Patients and methods: This study enrolled women aged ≥18 years old with either HR+, HER2- (Parts E and G), or HER2+ (Parts F and H) MBC. Additional requirements included measurable disease or non-measurable but evaluable bone disease (Parts E and F), or measurable disease (Parts G and H), an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and no prior treatment with CDK4/6i (Parts E, F, and H). Adverse events were graded, and tumor response was assessed. Results: Nineteen patients in Part E received abemaciclib (150 mg, n=15; 200 mg, n=4) with exemestane + everolimus, 24 patients in Part F received abemaciclib (150 mg, n=18; 200 mg, n=6) with trastuzumab, 12 patients in Part G received 150 mg abemaciclib with fulvestrant + LY3023414 (100 mg, n=7; 150 mg, n=5), and four patients in Part H received abemaciclib (100 mg) with trastuzumab + pertuzumab (with prophylactic loperamide). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea, fatigue, neutropenia, and nausea. Grade ≥3 TEAEs were reported in 16, 18, 10, and 4 patients in Parts E-H, respectively. Abemaciclib had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of the combination study drugs. The objective response rates for patients with measurable disease were 46.2%, 10.0%, 66.7%, and 25.0% in Parts E-H, respectively. A recommended Phase 2 dose was not established for Parts E, G, and H at the dose levels evaluated, and was determined to be 150 mg Q12H in Part F. Conclusions: Overall, our results demonstrate safety profiles consistent with those previously established for abemaciclib and provide preliminary data for these combination therapies in the treatment of HR+, HER2- or HER2+ MBC.