ArticleJHLT open2024
Does temporary mechanical circulatory support with Impella 5.5 induce de novo human leukocyte antigen antibodies production in heart transplantation candidates?
Article in JHLT open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Prolonged Impella 5.5 Support on Post-Transplant Outcomes: An Institutional Study.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Bridge-to-transplant temporary mechanical circulatory support and risk of allosensitization.Clinical transplantation · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Little is known about de novo human luekocyte antigen (HLA) antibody development with Impella 5.5 temporary mechanical circulatory assist support and downstream effects following heart transplantation in the new heart allocation system. Methods: Thirteen Impella and 17 control patients without device support were prospectively enrolled between December 2020 and June 2022. HLA antibodies with calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) were assessed pre and postdevice implantation and within 1-year postheart transplantation. Results: Baseline prevalence of HLA antibodies and median cPRA were similar between groups. Patients in the study arm were on Impella support for a median of 7 days. No significant differences in HLA antibodies were observed postdevice or postheart transplant. One patient in the Impella arm developed rejection and required treatment. One Impella patient died due to infection and 1 control patient died due to primary graft dysfunction. Conclusions: Short-term use of Impella 5.5 in the new heart allocation system does not appear to increase risk of de novo HLA antibody development. Further studies are needed to validate these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.