Evidence mapPaperPMID 40144307Full record

ArticleJournal of multimorbidity and comorbidity

Anna Bernhardt Lyhnebeck, John Sahl Andersen, Søren T Skou, Mette Bech Risør, Ann Dorrit Guassora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Bernhardt LyhnebeckThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-2962
John Sahl AndersenThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren T SkouThe Research Unit PROgrez, Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-7059
Mette Bech RisørThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7912-5804
Ann Dorrit GuassoraThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Understanding patients' expectations of health care is central to providing patient-centered care and improving patient satisfaction. However, the current literature is primarily focused on single disease-specific patient expectations. Aim: To develop an in-depth understanding of the expectations patients with musculoskeletal conditions and comorbidities have towards physiotherapists working in private physiotherapy practice. Methods: 35 observations with patients with musculoskeletal conditions and comorbidities receiving treatment in a Danish private physiotherapy setting were conducted. Of these, nine patients participated in interviews. A Grounded Theory analysis was undertaken, and categories were formed and agreed upon through an inductive approach grounded in the data. Results: Three major themes emerged from the data 1) Professional expertise is needed but will not be enough if enthusiasm fades in a long treatment course 2) Being able to laugh about life when you have many health problems 3) The balance of involvement and the sharing of power and responsibility. Patients express a desire for a strong bond with their physiotherapists, fostering intimacy and mutual understanding. They seek light-hearted interactions and wish to share personal aspects like family dynamics and hobbies. The study also underscores their expectations for sharing power and care tailored to their specific needs. Conclusion: Our findings reveal that patients with musculoskeletal conditions and comorbidities have clear expectations of treatment and collaboration with their physiotherapists in private physiotherapy practice. Underscoring personal relationships over physical results and demonstrating that this patient group has resources to support treatment and is clear about levels of involvement and collaboration.

Indexed as

comorbiditymusculoskeletal diseasesphysical therapy specialtyqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40144307
PMCPMC11938482

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.