Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144639›Full record

ArticleAnnals of obstetrics and gynecology2025

Translational Implications of The Gut Microbiome in Women with A Benign or Malignant Pelvic Mass.

Priya Sabu, Harsh B Pathak, Emily Nissen, Prabhakar Chalise, Devin C Koestler, Andrew K Godwin, Shahid Umar, Lori Spoozak, Andrea Jewell, Diane E Mahoney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of obstetrics and gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Priya SabuDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Harsh B PathakDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Emily NissenDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Prabhakar ChaliseDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Devin C KoestlerKansas Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Andrew K GodwinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Shahid UmarDepartment of Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Lori SpoozakDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Andrea JewellDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.
Diane E MahoneySchool of Nursing, University of Kansas Medical Center, USA.

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUSAN J. BROWN · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROY A. JENSEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Using Integrated Omics to Identify Dysfunctional Genetic Mechanisms Influencing Schizophrenia and Sleep DisturbancesP20GM130423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI Diane E Mahoney · 2019 to 2026
$21.5M
Extracellular Vesicle Proteomic Fingerprinting of Ovarian Cancer for Early Detection with a Nanoengineered MicrosystemR01CA260132 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI GODWIN, ANDREW K., ZENG, YONG · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260132NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The role of the gut microbiome in non-gastrointestinal cancers has generated growing interest in the field of gynecologic oncology. Our objective was to characterize the gut microbiome in women with a pelvic mass suspicious for ovarian cancer. We hypothesized that (1) women with a pelvic mass would have reduced gut microbiota bacterial diversity compared to healthy controls and (2) gut microbial diversity would differ between benign disease compared to ovarian cancer. Methods: In this case-control observational study, patients who presented with a suspicious pelvic mass were recruited from university affiliated gynecologic oncology clinics for fecal biospecimen donation. Fecal samples that were obtained from patients underwent 16S rRNA gene sequencing for microbial evaluation and statistical analysis. We used the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) Data Portal to compare gut microbiota profiles for our study to that of healthy female controls. Results: Fifteen patients with a pelvic mass were included ages 24-75 years. When comparing the gut microbiomes of these patients to 82 healthy females from the HMP Dataset, those with a pelvic mass had a significantly lower microbiota gut bacterial diversity. On the final pathology, 8 of the 15 patients with a suspicious pelvic mass had ovarian cancer and 7 had benign disease. Although not statistically significant, the alpha diversity was marginally reduced in patients with ovarian cancer compared to those with benign disease. Conclusion: These findings underscore the necessity for validation in larger patient cohorts for clinical translation as a potential tool for disease diagnostics and disease prediction in diverse populations.

Indexed as

Clinical translationMicrobial compositionMicrobiomeMicrobiome diversityOvarian cancerPelvic mass

Identifiers

PMID40144639
PMCPMC11938803

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.