ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Image-based yield prediction for tall fescue using random forests and convolutional neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the early stages of selection, many plant breeding programmes still rely on visual evaluations of traits by experienced breeders. While this approach has proven to be effective, it requires considerable time, labour and expertise. Moreover, its subjective nature makes it difficult to reproduce and compare evaluations. The field of automated high-throughput phenotyping aims to resolve these issues. A widely adopted strategy uses drone images processed by machine learning algorithms to characterise phenotypes. This approach was used in the present study to assess the dry matter yield of tall fescue and its accuracy was compared to that of the breeder's evaluations, using field measurements as ground truth. RGB images of tall fescue individuals were processed by two types of predictive models: a random forest and convolutional neural network. In addition to computing dry matter yield, the two methods were applied to identify the top 10% highest-yielding plants and predict the breeder's score. The convolutional neural network outperformed the random forest method and exceeded the predictive power of the breeder's eye. It predicted dry matter yield with an R² of 0.62, which surpassed the accuracy of the breeder's score by 8 percentage points. Additionally, the algorithm demonstrated strong performance in identifying top-performing plants and estimating the breeder's score, achieving balanced accuracies of 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. These findings indicate that the tested automated phenotyping approach could not only offer improvements in cost, time efficiency and objectivity, but also enhance selection accuracy. As a result, this technique has the potential to increase overall breeding efficiency, accelerate genetic progress, and shorten the time to market. To conclude, phenotyping by means of RGB-based machine learning models provides a reliable alternative or addition to the visual evaluation of selection candidates in a tall fescue breeding programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.