Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40144813›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Endocrine Society2025

Long-Acting Growth Hormone for Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency.

Norbert Albers, Sarah Cadarette, Ben Feakins, María Arregui, Stephen Ebohon, Pamela Lai, Subhara Raveendran, Mads Kjelgaard-Hansen, Christine Andersen, Carol Zhao and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. New directions in growth hormone treatment in children.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Norbert AlbersDepartment of Pediatric Endocrinology, Christliches Kinderhospital, Osnabrueck 49074, Germany.
Sarah CadaretteCencora, Conshohocken, PA 19428, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-8769
Ben FeakinsCencora, Conshohocken, PA 19428, USA.
María ArreguiCencora, Hannover D-30159, Germany.
Stephen EbohonCencora, London WC2B 4PJ, UK.
Pamela LaiAscendis Pharma Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Subhara RaveendranAscendis Pharma Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Mads Kjelgaard-HansenAscendis Pharma A/S, Hellerup DK-2900, Denmark.
Christine AndersenAscendis Pharma A/S, Hellerup DK-2900, Denmark.
Carol ZhaoAscendis Pharma Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Alden SmithAscendis Pharma Inc, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Mitchell GeffnerCenter for Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Saban Research Institute of Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.

Indexed as

literature reviewlong-acting growth hormonemeta-analysispediatric growth hormone deficiency

Identifiers

PMID40144813
PMCPMC11938432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.