ReviewJournal of the Endocrine Society2025
Long-Acting Growth Hormone for Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency.
Review in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery and optimization of a pH-responsive ultra-long-acting VHH-based growth hormone mimetic.mAbs · 2026Article
- Long-Acting Growth Hormone Versus Daily Growth Hormone for Growth Hormone Deficiency Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- Precision Dosing for Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency With Daily and Weekly Growth Hormone.MedComm · 2026Article
- Pharmacovigilance evaluation of somatrogon-associated adverse events in real-world databases.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Predictors of Response to Growth Hormone Therapy in Children with Idiopathic Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Two-year real-world experience with somatrogon in children and adolescents with growth hormone deficiency.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Long-Acting Growth Hormone for Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2025Review
- Research progress in abnormal carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- New directions in growth hormone treatment in children.Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-acting growth hormone (LAGH) has the potential to improve adherence and outcomes over daily somatropin in growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Whereas daily somatropin products are molecularly identical, LAGHs are molecularly distinct; additional moieties or mechanisms that prolong LAGH action confer unique pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties that could affect efficacy and safety. Only one LAGH available in the United States and Europe (lonapegsomatropin) delivers unmodified somatropin. With no head-to-head clinical trials of LAGHs available, this systematic literature review and network meta-analysis were conducted to compare the relative efficacy and safety of LAGHs in pediatric GHD. Five trials were eligible for inclusion in a Bayesian network meta-analysis; 3 contributed to the base case network, including 3 LAGHs (lonapegsomatropin, somapacitan, and somatrogon) and daily somatropin. Treatment with lonapegsomatropin was associated with statistically significantly higher annualized height velocity and change from baseline in height SD score (SDS) at week 52 compared to daily somatropin and somapacitan; no other significant differences in these outcomes were found. The change from baseline in average insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS at week 52 was significantly higher for somatrogon vs all comparators and for lonapegsomatropin vs daily somatropin and somapacitan; average IGF-1 SDS was within normal range in all trials. No significant differences were seen in progression in bone age-to-chronological age ratio or serious adverse events (SAEs). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the base case. In this network meta-analysis, lonapegsomatropin was the only LAGH associated with better growth outcomes. No significant differences were detected regarding SAEs; other safety outcomes could not be analyzed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.