Evidence mapPaperPMID 40145018Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Community-Engaged Codesign and Piloting of the FOOD4MOMS Produce Prescription Program for Pregnant Latina Women.

Sofia Segura-Pérez, Andrea Tristán Urrutia, Anqi He, Amber Hromi-Fiedler, Katina Gionteris, Kathleen O Duffany, Elizabeth C Rhodes, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nutrition and Culinary Education in Food Is Medicine Interventions: A Scoping Review.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sofia Segura-PérezHispanic Health Council, Hartford CT, USA.
Andrea Tristán UrrutiaHispanic Health Council, Hartford CT, USA.
Anqi HeDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven CT, USA.
Amber Hromi-FiedlerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven CT, USA.
Katina GionterisWholesome Wave, Bridgeport CT, USA.
Kathleen O DuffanyDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven CT, USA.
Elizabeth C RhodesHubert Department of Public Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta GA, USA.
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven CT, USA.

Funding

NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Eating plenty of fruit and vegetables is key for maternal-child food and nutrition security. In the United States, fruit and vegetable consumption is lower among low-income families. Produce prescription programs (PRx) provide monetary benefits to low-income individuals to buy fresh produce or directly provide the produce itself to improve their food and nutrition security. Objective: To codesign the FOOD4MOMS PRx (F4M) program for low-income Hispanic pregnant mothers and to test its feasibility through a pilot study using the Program Impact Pathway framework. Methods: The participants for the codesign phase and the feasibility phase were recruited from the Hispanic Health Council Maternal Health Programs and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children program. Listening sessions (LSs) with adult Hispanic pregnant and nonpregnant women with children aged <3 y were conducted and transcribed for thematic analysis to inform the F4M codesign. The pilot feasibility study only included adult pregnant women enrolled during the first 2 pregnancy trimesters. Results: The 3 codesign LSs (n = 21 participants) showed that participants thought good nutrition was very important during pregnancy and were very interested in having skill-building nutrition classes as part of the PRx. Most participants preferred receiving incentives through the Fresh Connect card to allow them to choose their produce. They also recognized that some participants with limited transportation options may benefit from a produce box delivered at home. All pilot study participants chose the electronic benefit transfer card as their incentive redemption channel. The redemption rate of benefits by pilot participants was 70% and they felt that F4M helped them and their families consume more produce. Pilot participants reported high levels of satisfaction with F4M. Conclusion: The community-engaged codesign approach likely explains the successful piloting of the feasibility of F4M and the strong satisfaction of the clients participating in it.

Indexed as

community engagedfood as medicineHispanicpregnant womenproduce prescriptionprogram design

Identifiers

PMID40145018
PMCPMC11938078

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.