Evidence mapPaperPMID 40145149Full record

SynthesisThe Clinical journal of pain2025

Engagement in Digital Self-management Interventions for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review.

R Ross MacLean, Rachel Shor, Erin D Reilly, Lillian Reuman, Chelsey Solar, Allison M Halat, Diana M Higgins

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Clinical journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R Ross MacLeanVISN1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-7828
Rachel ShorDepartment of Psychiatry, Center for the Study of Traumatic Stress, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.
Erin D ReillyVISN1 Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, VA Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford.
Lillian ReumanDepartment of Psychology, Stonehill College, Easton.
Chelsey SolarAviva Psychology Services.
Allison M HalatDepartment of Psychiatry, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Diana M HigginsDepartment of Psychiatry, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

Funding

CSRD VA IK2 CX002286RRD VA I01 RX004804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDigital interventions promise to increase access to non-pharmacological chronic pain treatment and reduce burden for both individuals seeking care and pain providers/clinics. Unfortunately, despite early evidence of efficacy, engagement in self-management digital interventions for chronic conditions is typically low. A comprehensive analysis into how engagement in these programs is measured and reported is warranted. The current systematic review evaluated engagement in digital self-management interventions for chronic pain and identified gaps to improve reporting of engagement data.

methodsWe conducted a pre-registered systematic review using Boolean search terms to identify digital chronic pain self-management interventions that did not include clinician support. After removal of duplicates and screening, 150 full-text manuscripts were assessed, and 43 studies met inclusion criteria. Data was extracted and examined from included manuscripts.

resultsOf the 43 included articles, five articles were based on 2 separate datasets, resulting in a final sample of 41 unique datasets representing 4205 participants that were mostly non-Hispanic White, female, and with at least some college education. Approximately 10% of studies did not report any data related to system use or self-reported engagement. Most engagement data consisted of mean system use variables, with a handful of studies describing self-reported use of skills and very few studies examining demographic variables associated with engagement. DISCUSSION: To address identified gaps in the reviewed literature, we suggest guidelines for collecting and reporting engagement in digital chronic pain interventions. Consistent reporting of engagement data will improve evaluation, efficacy, and improvement of interventions designed to assist individuals who may otherwise not receive non-pharmacological pain treatment.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementSelf-ManagementHumanschronic paindigital interventionengagementself-management

Identifiers

PMID40145149
PMCPMC12150219

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.