Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40145286›Full record

ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing

Broad Support Among Stakeholders for Collaboration Between Traditional Bonesetters and Formal Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Joost Binnerts, Thom C C Hendriks, Nneka Buzugbe, Jovine Okoth, Carolina Torres Perez-Iglesias, Nefti Bempong-Ahun, Geoffrey Ibbotson, William J Harrison, Claude Martin, Michael Edwards and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joost BinnertsRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6229-4348
Thom C C HendriksRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Nneka BuzugbeVrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jovine OkothShirati KMT Hospital, Shirati, Mara Region, Tanzania.
Carolina Torres Perez-IglesiasHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-6746
Nefti Bempong-AhunGlobal Surgery Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Geoffrey IbbotsonGlobal Surgery Foundation, Geneva, Switzerland.
William J HarrisonAO Alliance, Davos, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7229-0041
Claude MartinAO Alliance, Davos, Switzerland.
Michael EdwardsRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Erik HermansRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bwire ChirangiShirati KMT Hospital, Shirati, Mara Region, Tanzania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extremity fractures are increasingly common in Sub-Saharan Africa. In many resource-limited settings, patients with fractures have historically sought out traditional bonesetters (TBSs) and continue to do so, in part due to the undercapacity of existing orthopedic facilities. This qualitative study investigates key stakeholder perspectives on intersectoral collaboration between the formal healthcare system and TBSs in treating extremity fractures in the Rorya district, Tanzania. We combined focus group discussions and semi-structured interviews with four key stakeholder groups: patients with previous fractures, TBSs, hospital staff, and local government representatives. Questions concerned stakeholder experience, advantages of TBS and hospital care, perspectives on collaboration, and potential facilitators and/or barriers. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis and inductive coding. Between June 2022 and August 2023, 35 TBSs, 9 patients with previous fractures, 5 hospital staff members, and 2 government representatives were interviewed. Participants unanimously recognized the need for collaboration between TBSs and hospitals. Identified barriers included TBSs' motivation for hospital referral, poor customer care at hospitals, and limited understanding of fracture management in hospitals by TBSs and patients. Implementation of a collaborative triage and referral system was most commonly suggested. This study summarized all relevant perspectives on intersectoral collaboration. A combined approach of a joint triage and referral system, augmented by community education and TBS training, may enhance the quality and accessibility of fracture care and potentially serve as a model for regions facing similar challenges. Further research is needed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of such initiatives in practice.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareFractures, BoneIntersectoral CollaborationMedicine, African TraditionalStakeholder ParticipationAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchResource-Limited SettingsTanzaniabonesettercollaborationfocus group discussionfracturehealth systeminjuryintersectoralinterviewsmedicineorthopedicsqualitative researchresource-limited settingsTanzaniatraditionaltrauma

Identifiers

PMID40145286
PMCPMC11948548

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.