ArticleJournal of food science2025
Optimizing production of gluten-free, sugar-reduced cupcakes: Utilizing stevia as natural sweetener and psyllium as gluten substitute.
Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing production of gluten-free, sugar-reduced cupcakes: Utilizing stevia as natural sweetener and psyllium as gluten substitute.Journal of food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive study was conducted to assess the effects of stevia (0%-1.2%), psyllium (0%-4%), and baking method (airfryer and oven) on the physical, textural, sensory, and pore characteristics of gluten-free, sugar-reduced cupcakes. The formulation was optimized using Response Surface Methodology-Central Composite Face-Centered Design (CCFD). Based on numerical optimization, the best cupcake formulation was predicted to contain 0.68% stevia and 1.82% psyllium, using the oven baking method. The optimized cupcake produced at this formulation exhibited the following characteristics: specific volume 38.75 mL/g, hardness 1710.85 gf, springiness 0.950, cohesiveness 0.638, gumminess 1119, chewiness 1042, resilience 0.350, and 44 pores. To analyze pore characteristics, the Otsu thresholding algorithm was employed, revealing a 2.5-fold increase in the number of pores in the optimized cupcake compared to the control. This study demonstrates that the combination of stevia as natural sweetener and psyllium as gluten substitute significantly enhances the quality of a low-calorie, gluten-free cupcake. Furthermore, this formulation provides a promising, clean option for consumers with chronic diseases such as celiac and diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.