ArticleInsights into imaging2025
Automatic sequence identification in multicentric prostate multiparametric MRI datasets for clinical machine-learning.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated identification of MRI series using a hierarchical modular machine-learning pipeline.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo present an accurate machine-learning (ML) method and knowledge-based heuristics for automatic sequence-type identification in multi-centric multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) datasets for prostate cancer (PCa) ML.
methodsRetrospective prostate mpMRI studies were classified into 5 series types-T2-weighted (T2W), diffusion-weighted images (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC), dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and other series types (others). Metadata was processed for all series and two models were trained (XGBoost after custom categorical tokenization and CatBoost with raw categorical data) using 5-fold cross-validation (CV) with different data fractions for learning curve analyses. For validation, two test sets-hold-out test set and temporal split-were used. A leave-one-group-out (LOGO) CV analysis was performed with centres as groups to understand the effect of dataset-specific data.
results4045 studies (31,053 series) and 1004 studies (7891 series) from 11 centres were used to train and test series identification models, respectively. Test F1-scores were consistently above 0.95 (CatBoost) and 0.97 (XGBoost). Learning curves demonstrate learning saturation, while temporal validation shows model remain capable of correctly identifying all T2W/DWI/ADC triplets. However, optimal performance requires centre-specific data-controlling for model and used feature sets when comparing CV with LOGOCV, F1-score dropped for T2W, DCE and others (-0.146, -0.181 and -0.179, respectively), with larger performance decreases for CatBoost (-0.265). Finally, we delineate heuristics to assist researchers in series classification for PCa mpMRI datasets.
conclusionsAutomatic series-type identification is feasible and can enable automated data curation. However, dataset-specific data should be included to achieve optimal performance. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Organising large collections of data is time-consuming but necessary to train clinical machine-learning models. To address this, we outline and validate an automatic series identification method that can facilitate this process. Finally, we outline a set of metadata-based heuristics that can be used to further automate series-type identification. KEY POINTS: Multi-centric prostate MRI studies were used for sequence annotation model training. Automatic sequence annotation requires few instances and generalises temporally. Sequence annotation, necessary for clinical AI model training, can be performed automatically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.