Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40146579›Full record

ReviewThe American psychologist

Cognitive disengagement syndrome: A construct at the crossroads.

Stephen P Becker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American psychologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Evolving ADHD Phenotype in the Externalizing Context.The American journal of psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cognitive disengagement syndrome and peer relationships of youth with critical congenital heart defects.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stephen P BeckerDivision of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.ORCID 0000-0001-9046-5183

Funding

Longitudinal Examination of Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Internalizing Psychopathology in AdolescenceR01MH122415 · NIMH · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI BECKER, STEPHEN P · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Cincinnati Children's Research Foundation (CCRF)NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122415US Department of Education; Institute of Education Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initially described in the mid-1980s, cognitive disengagement syndrome (CDS; previously termed sluggish cognitive tempo) is a set of symptoms comprising excessive daydreaming, mental confusion, and hypoactivity that is distinct from attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other psychopathology dimensions and independently associated with functional outcomes. This article provides a broad overview of the history of the CDS construct, its terminology, and the current state of the science. Although there has been a marked upsurge in research on CDS, including psychometrically rigorous assessment tools and an emerging pattern of findings across numerous domains of functioning, the existing literature base also points to the importance of marshaling an ambitious research agenda that can guide CDS into its next era. Ten key research domains and open questions are highlighted, including (1) developmental course of CDS across the lifespan, (2) mechanisms linking CDS to functional outcomes and impairment, (3) importance of gathering normative data, (4) clarifying CDS and unidimensional or multidimensional, (5) etiologies of CDS, (6) neurobiology and psychophysiology of CDS, (7) CDS as a transdiagnostic trait, (8) understanding individuals with elevated CDS, (9) promoting participatory approaches and valuing lived experience, and (10) the role of CDS for intervention. Implications of this research for possible conceptualizations of CDS as a distinct disorder, diagnostic specifier, or transdiagnostic dimension are discussed. The road ahead will require increased collaboration, creativity, and rigor to build theory, and, ultimately, support the well-being of individuals with this syndrome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

CognitionHumansSyndrome

Identifiers

PMID40146579
PMCPMC12289433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.