ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Fine-mapping in admixed populations using CARMA-X, with applications to Latin American studies.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- TLS-Tractor: A transfer learning framework for incorporating summary-statistics into local ancestry-aware GWAS in admixed populations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic regulation of the plasma proteome and its link to cardiometabolic disease in Greenlandic Inuit.American journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Towards improved fine-mapping of candidate causal variants.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025Review
- Genetic and Cellular Architecture of Breast Cancer Risk in Multi-Ancestry Studies of 159,297 Cases and 212,102 Controls.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Brain banks in Latin America: Infrastructure for diagnosis, research, and scientific equity in Mexico and the Caribbean.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in ancestrally diverse populations are rapidly expanding, opening up unique opportunities for novel gene discoveries and increased utility of genetic findings in non-European individuals. A popular technique to identify putative causal variants at GWAS loci is via statistical fine-mapping. Despite tremendous efforts, fine-mapping remains a very challenging task, even in the relatively simple scenario of studies with a single, homogeneous population. For studies with admixed individuals, such as within Latin America and the Caribbean, methods for gene discovery are still limited. Here, we propose a Bayesian model for fine-mapping in admixed populations, CARMA-X, that addresses some of the unique challenges of admixed individuals. The proposed method includes an estimation method for the linkage disequilibrium (LD) matrix that accounts for small reference panels for admixed individuals, heterogeneity across populations and cross-ancestry LD, and a Bayesian hypothesis test that leads to robust fine-mapping when relying on external reference panels of modest size for LD estimation. Using simulations, we compare performance with recently proposed fine-mapping methods for multi-ancestry studies and show that the proposed model provides higher power while controlling false discoveries, especially when using an out-of-sample LD matrix. We further illustrate our approach through applications to two Latin American genetic studies, the Estudio Familiar de Influencia Genética en Alzheimer (EFIGA) study in the Dominican Republic and the Mexican Biobank, where we show the benefit of modeling ancestry-specific effects by prioritizing putative causal variants and genes, including several findings driven by ancestry-specific effects in the African and Native American ancestries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.