Trial reportEnvironmental research2025
Forest terpenes and stress: Examining the associations of filtered vs. non-filtered air in a real-life natural environment.
Trial report in Environmental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cannabinoid Vaping Products: Regulation, Composition, Toxicological Effects, and Emerging Research.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human health may benefit from exposure to a class of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) consisting of isoprene units, known as terpenes. In this double-blind, randomized crossover trial, participants sat in a forest for two 60-min sessions, one in which terpenes were filtered out of the ambient air they breathed, and another in which they were not, separated by a minimum of an eight-day washout period. The primary outcome was the high frequency (HF) component of heart rate variability (HRV; measured continuously). Secondary outcomes included skin conductance levels (SCL) (measured continuously), self-reported stress and affect (measured every 20 min), blood pressure, heart rate, cortisol and inflammatory cytokines (measured before and after sessions). Serum concentrations of terpenes (measured before and after sessions) were also assessed to investigate the association of absorbed dose with these outcomes. We did not observe a significant association of filter condition with most outcomes; although the trends for affect, systolic blood pressure, cortisol, TNF-α, and CRP were all in the hypothesized direction. We did observe a significant association with interleukin-6, which was -0.19 pg/mL lower in the terpenes-on vs. terpenes-off condition, adjusted for baseline (95 % CI: -0.35, -0.03); and SCL over the session as a whole. A sensitivity analysis of the subset of data from participants who completed both conditions supports these findings and revealed additional significant associations with SCL (95 % CI: -1.87, -0.05); and TNF-α (95 % CI: -2.63, -0.10). To our knowledge, this is the first RCT to filter terpenes from ambient air during forest contact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.