Trial reportTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Combined with Cytarabine and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Treating Newly Diagnosed Older and Unfit Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center, Single-arm, Phase II Study.
Trial report in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundEffective treatment options are limited for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A prospective phase II study was conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) combined with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in newly diagnosed older and unfit AML patients.MethodsTwenty-two patients were enrolled and deemed evaluable. The study included one cycle of induction and four cycles of consolidation, followed by maintenance therapy.ResultsThe median age of enrolled patients was 71.5 years (range, 63 to 82 years), and 16 patients (72.7%) were over 70 years of age. The overall response rate (ORR) was 77.3% (n = 17) and the complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete recovery (CRi) rate was 63.6% (n = 14) after the first induction cycle. With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, eight patients (57.1%) relapsed, with a median time to relapse of 12.3 months. The median duration of response (DOR) was 11.9 months (95% CI, 6.4 to NA months), the median overall survival (OS) was 15 months (95% CI, 8.4 to 21.6 months), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months (95% CI, 4.6 to 15.1 months). Common grade 3 or greater adverse events included febrile neutropenia (77.8%) and infection (63.6%), with pneumonia being the most common (10, 45.5%). There was one death (4.5%) within 30 days.ConclusionThe combination of PLD, LDAC, and G-CSF is well-tolerated and exhibits high rates of CR/CRi and low early mortality, providing an attractive treatment option for newly diagnosed elderly and unfit AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.