ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of prehospital advanced airway management on cardiac arrest patients who underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of prehospital advanced airway management (AAM) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation remains unclear. In this retrospective study, we analysed data from the Study of Advanced Cardiac Life Support for Ventricular Fibrillation with Extracorporeal Circulation in Japan II, encompassing 36 institutions in Japan (2013-2018). Patients were divided into two groups: those who received prehospital AAM and those who did not. The primary outcome was a favourable neurological outcome at discharge, and secondary outcomes included 30-day survival, estimated low-flow time, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. A generalised estimating equation model adjusted for prehospital confounders was used for between-group comparisons. Sensitivity analysis was performed using propensity score matching. Among 1,789 patients, those who received prehospital AAM had significantly lower favourable neurological outcomes at discharge, lower 30-day survival, longer low-flow time, shorter mechanical ventilation days, and shorter intensive care unit stay days than those who did not receive prehospital AAM. Propensity score-matched analysis confirmed these findings. Prehospital AAM in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest undergoing extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to optimise prehospital care for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.