ReviewBMC infectious diseases2025
Infective endocarditis caused by Streptococcus sinensis diagnosed with next-generation sequencing: a case report and literature review.
Review in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AtypicalThe Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Eravacycline-Cefiderocol Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Infective endocarditis complicated with multiple cerebral embolism and hemorrhage caused byFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnosis of pleural aspergillosis caused by Aspergillus infection via metagenomic next-generation sequencing from a patient with unexplained pleural effusion: a case report.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfective endocarditis (IE) caused by Streptococcus sinensis is rare and challenging to diagnose due to the irregular use of antibiotics and the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods. Metagenomaic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a valuable diagnostic tool, offering significantly enhanced accuracy in identifying elusive pathogens, particularly in blood culture-negative endocarditis (BCNE). CASE PRESENTATION: We reported the case of a 33-year-old male who presented with recurrent intermittent fever lasting over six months. Despite multiple diagnostic attempts, including blood cultures, no causative pathogen was identified. Blood mNGS revealed the presence of S. sinensis, a rare pathogen associated with IE. Echocardiography confirmed vegetation on the mitral and aortic valves, leading to a possible diagnosis of IE. The patient underwent successful surgical valve replacement, and subsequent mNGS of excised valve tissue confirmed the presence of S. sinensis. We administered a tailored antibiotic regimen, and the patient achieved a favorable recovery with no significant complications during follow-up.
resultsWe identified 11 additional cases of S. sinensis-induced IE through a literature review, including patients from diverse geographic regions and age groups. Most cases were associated with prior dental procedures or poor oral health. Common diagnostic methods included blood culture and 16 S rRNA sequencing, while recent cases utilized mNGS. Treatment typically involved penicillin-based antibiotics combined with gentamicin, with surgical intervention in most cases leading to favorable outcomes.
conclusionsThis case highlights the diagnostic value of mNGS in identifying pathogens in IE, particularly when traditional methods fail due to prior antibiotic use. While mNGS has significant advantages in pathogen detection, it cannot replace standard microbiological techniques and should be considered a complementary approach. Integrating mNGS into clinical workflows can improve diagnostic accuracy, especially in BCNE cases, and guide effective treatment strategies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.