ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Biochemical and gene expression profiling of five pear species under drought stress conditions.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drought is one of the crucial abiotic stresses which affects growth, development, and performance of pear trees. This research was performed to investigate responses of five pear species including Pyrus communis L., Pyrus boissieriana Bushe., Pyrus glabra Boiss., Pyrus syriaca Boiss., and Pyrus salicifolia Pall. to different levels of drought stress. The potted trees were irrigated with water volume of 100%, 60%, or 30% of field capacity (FC) during 90 days. Based on the visual observation, the plant growth was restricted by severe drought in all species. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and glycine betaine (GB) contents, as well as the ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) and catalase (CAT) activities were indicated an uprising behavior under drought stress. Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis revealed P. glabra as tolerant and P. communis as sensitive to drought stress. The expression rates of stress-responsive transcription factors (TFs); WRKY29 and DREB6 and their responding genes, including LEA29 and Dehydrin1, were analyzed in the two differentially drought-responding pear species i.e., P. glabra and P. communis. The expression of the studied TFs was induced when both species were exposed to higher drought levels. The species P. glabra exhibited better osmoregulation, antioxidant response, and higher up-regulation of WRKY29, DREB6, LEA29 and Dehydrin1. In conclusion, among the studied pear species, P. glabra could best tolerate drought stress by boosting protective mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.