ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Northern China.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Persistent Sex Disparities in Pre-Hospital Delay Among Patients With STEMI Despite Overall Improvements: Findings From the Chinese Cardiovascular Association Chest Pain Center Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impacts of COVID-19 on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) care were heterogeneous. The study aims to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of AMI patients in China during different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsThis is a multicenter retrospective cohort study in Shanxi Province of northern China. Patients diagnosed with AMI during the zero-case, lockdown, and outbreak periods were included. Characteristics and outcomes were analyzed according to time periods and COVID-19 infection. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Additional outcomes included reperfusion times, coronary angiographic measures, procedure or AMI-associated complications, arrhythmia, other adverse events, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).
resultsThe study included 1021 AMI patients, with 393, 250, and 378 from the zero-case, lockdown, and outbreak periods. No differences in in-hospital mortality or other adverse events were found by time periods. By infection status, 264 patients were COVID-positive, and 706 were COVID-negative. The COVID-positive ST-elevation myocardial infarction population had longer symptom-to-first medical contact (3.07 vs. 2.31, p = 0.026), pre-hospital time (4.58 vs. 3.67, p = 0.032), door-to-balloon (1.20 vs. 1.08, p = 0.046), and total ischemic time (5.80 vs. 4.70, p = 0.011). No differences in other in-hospital outcomes were found, except that multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated COVID-19 infection was correlated with increased risks of LVSD (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.69, p = 0.015).
conclusionsIn-hospital mortality did not differ by time period or COVID-19 infection status. The COVID-positive AMI patients had longer reperfusion times and higher risks of LVSD. AMI treatments were impacted during the pandemic, and measures are warranted to minimize the reperfusion time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.