ArticleCancer cell international2025
Integrated single-cell and bulk transcriptomic analysis identifies a novel macrophage subtype associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast Cancer Milieu Maneuvers Cancer-Associated Macrophages to Synergize Neoplastic Repertoires.Cancers · 2026Review
- The puppet master in the breast cancer "microecological community": spatial and metabolic regulation of macrophage heterogeneity.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Macrophage polarization in gynecologic malignancies: key signaling pathways and clinical perspectives.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: From Tumor Microenvironment Reprogramming to Combination Therapy Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- The Trojan Horse Within: Mechanisms of Immune Evasion in Breast Cancer.Cancer heterogeneity and plasticity · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are pivotal components of the breast cancer (BC) tumor microenvironment (TME), significantly influencing tumor progression and response to therapy. However, the heterogeneity and specific roles of TAM subpopulations in BC remain inadequately understood.
methodsWe performed an integrated analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from BC patients to comprehensively characterize TAM heterogeneity. Utilizing the MetaTiME computational framework and consensus clustering, we identified distinct TAM subtypes and assessed their associations with clinical outcomes and treatment responses. A machine learning-based predictive model was developed to evaluate the prognostic significance of TAM-related gene expression profiles.
resultsOur analysis revealed three distinct TAM subgroups. Notably, we identified a novel macrophage subtype, M_Macrophage-SPP1-C1Q, characterized by high expression of SPP1 and C1QA, representing an intermediate differentiation state with unique proliferative and oncogenic properties. High infiltration of M_Macrophage-SPP1-C1Q was significantly associated with poor overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy resistance in BC patients. We developed a Random Forest (RF)-based predictive model, Macro.RF, which accurately stratified patients based on survival outcomes and chemotherapy responses, independent of established prognostic parameters.
conclusionThis study uncovers a previously unrecognized TAM subtype that drives poor prognosis in BC. The identification of M_Macrophage-SPP1-C1Q enhances our understanding of TAM heterogeneity within the TME and offers a novel prognostic biomarker. The Macro.RF model provides a robust tool for predicting clinical outcomes and guiding personalized treatment strategies in BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.