Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148948›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evaluation of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid for patients with type 2 diabetes in an academic primary care clinic in Malaysia: a mixed method study.

Wen Ting Tong, Chirk Jenn Ng, Yew Kong Lee, Ping Yein Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Implementation research in Primary Care (Part 1): What is implementation research?Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wen Ting TongDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. tongwenting@um.edu.my.
Chirk Jenn NgDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Yew Kong LeeDepartment of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ping Yein LeeeHealth Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

University of Malaya Postgraduate Research Grant (PPP) PG264-2016AUniversity of Malaya Research Grant (UMRG) RP041C-15HTM
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiterature surrounding patient decision aid (PDA) focus on testing effectiveness such as measuring patient or practice outcomes, while few studies looked into evaluation of implementation outcomes. It is important to assess implementation outcomes because in order for PDA to deliver its intended effects, they should first be effectively implemented. This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of an insulin PDA in an academic primary care clinic specifically measuring implementation outcomes.

methodsA mixed-methods sequential explanatory design was used. This study was conducted at a primary care clinic in an academic hospital from April - November 2018. The insulin PDA was implemented using a tailored implementation intervention, which comprised of 11 strategies aiming to overcome 13 prioritised implementation barriers. Evaluation data were collected from: healthcare administrators such as the head of department, the clinic coordinator, and the nursing officer who oversees the clinic operations, doctors whose tasks were to deliver the insulin PDA to patients, nurses who were responsible for making sure the insulin PDAs were available, and patients with type 2 diabetes who were offered the insulin PDA. The study commenced with the quantitative approach to assess 'Reach', 'Adoption', 'Implementation' and 'Maintenance'of the insulin PDA. Subsequently, qualitative approach was employed and qualitative interviews were conducted with the relevant stakeholders to explain the quantitative outcomes. A total of six IDIs and six FGDs were conducted with healthcare providers (healthcare policymakers: 3, doctors: 35, and staff nurses: 5), and 62 IDIs were conducted with patients.

resultsFor 'Reach', 88.9% (n = 48/54) of doctors and 55% (n = 11/20) of nurses attended the insulin PDA training workshops. This was attributed to their self-motivation and the mandate from the Head of Department. The PDA reached 387 patients and was facilitated by the doctors who delivered the PDA to them and their own desire to know more about insulin. Doctors' 'Adoption' of the PDA was high (83.3%, n = 45/54) due to the positive personal experience with the usefulness of the PDA. Only 65.7% (n = 94/143) of patients who received the PDA read it. The degree of 'Implementation' of the PDA varied for different tasks (ranged from 19.2 to 84.9%) and was challenged by patient and system barriers. For 'Maintenance', 80% of the doctors were willing to continue using the PDA due to its benefits.

conclusionThis study highlighted that the implementation of an insulin PDA in a primary care setting is promising. Addressing the issues of social hierarchy, and healthcare providers' roles and responsibilities can further improve implementation outcomes.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Hypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAcademic Medical CentersAdultFemaleHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinEvaluationImplementation outcomesImplementation scienceImplementation strategyPatient decision aidShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID40148948
PMCPMC11948817

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.