Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40148960›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Continuous quality improvement across a South Australian health service and the role it plays in a learning health system: a qualitative study.

Mia Bierbaum, Susan Hillier, Louise A Ellis, Robyn Clay-Williams, Angie Goodrich, Robert Padbury, Peter Hibbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mia BierbaumIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Susan HillierIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Louise A EllisAustralian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Robyn Clay-WilliamsAustralian Institute of Health Innovation (AIHI), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Angie GoodrichSouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Robert PadburySouthern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia.
Peter HibbertIIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia. Peter.hibbert@unisa.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionContinuous quality improvement (CQI) initiatives are commonly used to enhance patient safety and quality of care. A novel South Australian Local Health Network (SALHN) Continuous Improvement Program (CIP009) has integrated a top-down model of executive-directed change initiatives, with a bottom-up approach of clinician designed interventions to address an organisational-wide goal of improved patient flow. This study evaluated the strengths and challenges of CIP009 implementation from the perspective of participants and deliverers.

methodsA qualitative study was conducted in 2023/2024 to evaluate the implementation of CIP009 and 12 associated quality improvement projects. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups were conducted with key stakeholders (executives, coaches and CIP009 fellows) and guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A document review and observations of CIP009 team meetings were also conducted. Data were analysed inductively using thematic analysis, then deductively mapped against the five CFIR domains.

resultsThirty-one participants were interviewed individually or in focus groups, two presentation days and six team meetings were observed, and 78 documents were reviewed. Seven key themes were identified highlighting key challenges and strengths of CIP009 implementation within the SALHN setting. These included four key strengths: the CIP framework and culture (the flexible framework, common language, training, and a culture of flattened hierarchy); the benefits of support from a dedicated, internal improvement Faculty (wrap around support from coaches); the advantages of an enthusiastic team member disposition and incentives (vested interests to enhance workflow and patient outcomes); and effective teams and team composition (teams comprised of senior clinician change agents). Three key challenges included: workforce and organisation-level challenges (individual workloads, workforce capacity, and data access); team cohesion, logistics and stakeholder engagement challenges (issues in the way teams worked together); and training and support shortcomings (the training course, and the top-down nature of CIP009).

conclusionThis evaluation identified that CIP009 was considered an effective multifaceted CQI program. The strengths of CIP009 support a learning health system (a data driven model, utilising systematic frameworks, with commitment from leadership, and a culture of continuous learning). Further integration of implementation science principles may support the program to overcome the key challenges identified. These findings will inform and guide improvement efforts within future iterations of CIP.

Indexed as

Learning Health SystemQuality ImprovementTotal Quality ManagementFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchSouth AustraliaAmbulance rampingCapacity buildingConsolidated framework for implementation researchContinuous quality improvementImplementation scienceLearning health systemPatient flowQualitative researchQuality improvementThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID40148960
PMCPMC11951570

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.