Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149201›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Exploiting Data Distribution: A Multi-Ranking Approach.

Beata Zielosko, Kamil Jabloński, Anton Dmytrenko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beata ZieloskoInstitute of Computer Science, University of Silesia in Katowice, Bȩdzińska 39, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3788-1094
Kamil JablońskiInstitute of Computer Science, University of Silesia in Katowice, Bȩdzińska 39, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland.ORCID 0009-0005-2817-5341
Anton DmytrenkoInstitute of Computer Science, University of Silesia in Katowice, Bȩdzińska 39, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland.ORCID 0009-0006-7317-1179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data heterogeneity is the result of increasing data volumes, technological advances, and growing business requirements in the IT environment. It means that data comes from different sources, may be dispersed in terms of location, and may be stored in different structures and formats. As a result, the management of distributed data requires special integration and analysis techniques to ensure coherent processing and a global view. Distributed learning systems often use entropy-based measures to assess the quality of local data and its impact on the global model. One important aspect of data processing is feature selection. This paper proposes a research methodology for multi-level attribute ranking construction for distributed data. The research was conducted on a publicly available dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. In order to disperse the data, a table division into subtables was applied using reducts, which is a very well-known method from the rough sets theory. So-called local rankings were constructed for local data sources using an approach based on machine learning models, i.e., the greedy algorithm for the induction of decision rules. Two types of classifiers relating to explicit and implicit knowledge representation, i.e., gradient boosting and neural networks, were used to verify the research methodology. Extensive experiments, comparisons, and analysis of the obtained results show the merit of the proposed approach.

Indexed as

decision rulesdecision treesdistributed dataensemblefeature selectiongreedy algorithmranking of attributes

Identifiers

PMID40149201
PMCPMC11940951

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.