ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Online Monitoring and Fault Diagnosis for High-Dimensional Stream with Application in Electron Probe X-Ray Microanalysis.
Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces an innovative two-stage framework for monitoring and diagnosing high-dimensional data streams with sparse changes. The first stage utilizes an exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) statistic for online monitoring, identifying change points through extreme value theory and multiple hypothesis testing. The second stage involves a fault diagnosis mechanism that accurately pinpoints abnormal components upon detecting anomalies. Through extensive numerical simulations and electron probe X-ray microanalysis applications, the method demonstrates exceptional performance. It rapidly detects anomalies, often within one or two sampling intervals post-change, achieves near 100% detection power, and maintains type-I error rates around the nominal 5%. The fault diagnosis mechanism shows a 99.1% accuracy in identifying components in 200-dimensional anomaly streams, surpassing principal component analysis (PCA)-based methods by 28.0% in precision and controlling the false discovery rate within 3%. Case analyses confirm the method's effectiveness in monitoring and identifying abnormal data, aligning with previous studies. These findings represent significant progress in managing high-dimensional sparse-change data streams over existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.