ReviewCancers2025
Liquid Biopsies in the Early Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Tailored Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanisms biomarkers and therapeutic strategies of human endogenous retroviruses in cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Digital immune twins and ai-integrated multi-omic biomarkers: Redefining personalized immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- High-Performance Silicon Nanowire Array Biosensor for Combined Detection of Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers.Micromachines · 2025Article
- Exploring research frontiers and emerging trends of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Validation of Prognostic Circulating Cell-Free RNA BiomarkersCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- New Generation of Clinical Epigenetics Analysis and Diagnosis for Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLiquid biopsies provide a less-invasive option to tissue biopsies for the early diagnosis, prognosis, and tailored therapy of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC is a major cause of cancer-related death, and early identification is essential for improving patient outcomes. REVIEW: Conventional diagnostic techniques, including colonoscopy and tissue biopsy, may be enhanced by liquid biopsies that examine circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and other indicators present in body fluids. These markers provide significant insights into tumor biology, heterogeneity, and therapeutic response. CTCs detected in early-stage CRC have prognostic significance for disease recurrence and survival, while ctDNA investigation may uncover genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations, and tumor development. The identification of ctDNA in minimal residual disease (MRD) postsurgery correlates with an elevated risk of recurrence and unfavorable prognosis, underscoring its use in assessing treatment effectiveness. Furthermore, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) contained inside EVs provide potential prospective biomarkers and therapeutic targets, facilitating diagnosis and treatment assessment. Notwithstanding the potential of liquid biopsies, obstacles persist in assay standardization, sensitivity enhancement, and the management of tumor heterogeneity. Additional extensive research is required to determine their function in clinical practice.
conclusionOverall, liquid biopsies serve as a potential instrument for real-time monitoring, evaluating therapy responses, and directing individualized therapeutic strategies in CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.