Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40149481›Full record

ReviewGenes2025

Methods for Extracellular Vesicle Isolation: Relevance for Encapsulated miRNAs in Disease Diagnosis and Treatment.

Maria Ljungström, Elisa Oltra

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria LjungströmEscuela de Doctorado, School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, 46001 Valencia, Spain.
Elisa OltraDepartment of Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia, 46001 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0598-2907

Funding

Generalitat Valenciana CIAICO 2021/103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanovesicles that facilitate intercellular communication by carrying essential biomolecules under physiological and pathological conditions including microRNAs (miRNAs). They are found in various body fluids, such as blood, urine, and saliva, and their levels fluctuate with disease progression, making them valuable diagnostic tools. However, isolating EVs is challenging due to their small size and biological complexity. Here, we summarize the principles behind the most common EV isolation methods including ultracentrifugation, precipitation, immunoaffinity, sorting, ultrafiltration, size exclusion chromatography, and microfluidics while highlighting protocol strengths and weaknesses. We also review the main strategies to identify and quantify circulating miRNAs with a particular focus on EV-encapsulated miRNAs. Since these miRNAs hold special clinical interest derived from their superior stability and therapeutic potential, the information provided here should provide valuable guidance for future research initiatives in the promising field of disease diagnostic and treatment based on EV-encapsulated miRNAs.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMicroRNAsAnimalsHumansMicroRNAsdiagnosisexosomeextracellular vesicleisolationmicroRNAtreatment

Identifiers

PMID40149481
PMCPMC11942051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.